I liked Kushner’s last novel, The Mars Room, but I’m happy to admit that parts of it went over my head. I didn’t understand the tangents involving Thoreau or Ted Kaczynski and thought them pointless. But having finished Creation Lake, I now wonder whether my issues with The Mars Room were a “me” problem.
Sadie Smith—not her real name—is a freelance spy—previously an employee of the FBI, since let go—who has been commissioned by the French Government to infiltrate a group of environmental activists in the French countryside protesting the development of Megabasins that will siphon off groundwater for “Big Agriculture”. And that’s it. That’s the plot. Yes, Sadie details how she infiltrates the group, but the stakes are so low that there’s next to no tension (until the messy climax, where the novel transforms into an episode of Slow Horses).
The joy that comes from reading this novel is all intellectual. In digging into the activists’ motivations, Sadie becomes obsessed with the emails of Bruno Lacombe, a father figure and influence for the activists. Sadie first thinks the emails are coded messages because no one could be that fascinated by Neanderthals.* But the more she reads—relaying Bruno’s words back to us—the more she realises that Bruno’s interest in early man is a critique of modernity, on how we have lost our way. As Sadie burrows down a series of rabbit holes—French Marxism (Guy Debord), cave paintings and the tragic history of the Cagots—she starts to question her lifestyle choices.
Sadie’s atonal voice, matter of fact and exhibiting zero care factor for the people she manipulates almost, but not entirely, hides her insecurities. It’s an interesting portrayal that again speaks to how desensitised we’ve become. Well, some of us. Your reaction to this novel will depend on whether you believe modernity has staying power, like the cave paintings, or whether the last century of art and culture will be forgotten in a morass of misinformation, banned books and scientific ignorance.**
Anyway, good book. Fascinating and chewy. But don’t come for the spy-craft shenanigans.
*Bruno refers to the Neanderthals as “Thals” throughout the novel. Rather distracting for any Doctor Who fan in the audience.
**There’s also the prevailing view that contemporary fiction is mostly shit, cookie-cutter stuff shaped by MFAs and marketing teams. There’s some truth in this. But like all broad generalisations, it ignores some of the extraordinary work still being published.
Spy novels sell. So it is called a spy novel.
Sadie is an agent provocateur. She is there to stir up trouble: mostly by convincing others to get themselves in trouble. The novel does a pretty good job of showing how an agent provocateur infiltrates groups, and how far various “entities” (to use the scare quotes Sadie despises) are willing to go. There is some elements in common with general espionage, so I would call it spy-adjacent.
I don’t pretend to understand every bit of it, but I do think there is one intended point of inverted-expectations which is that it is Sadie who pays the closest attention to what the sage in the cave is saying.
One item, that I think might be important, but confused me is the interaction with her fiancée’s uncle. Where did the warning note (She is not what she seems) come from? Is what happened with his character coincidence? I am thinking not: which is counter to it being low stakes.
It is not clear to me why her employers were upset with the French minister. I did see an interview where Ms. Kushner states that this farcical ending is modeled on the type of French noir writing that she is somewhat channeling in her book. Apparently it was a common way to end some otherwise pretty gritty books. In that way I would say it is the opposite of the Slow-Horses in that they tend to start off as farce, but with serious conclusions. In any case, (I think) we are in agreement that the endings delivery was a letdown.
Yeah, the ending didn’t really come together for me. It all becomes a bit Slow Horses for my tastes. And thanks for reminding me about the notes. I forgot that they were a thing, which just shows how little invested I was in the spy-related shenanigans and more in the discussion on modernity.